“I changed the description, but the replies did not change”
Before rewriting a whole character, identify which description you edited. A discovery card can explain the character to a reader without supplying the model’s instructions.
Rochat makes this distinction explicit. Its Public Info guide says this information appears on the card and profile and does not affect the prompts used in chat. The introduction is generated from settings after creation but can be edited. Making that introduction say “careful, never guesses” is therefore not the documented way to change how the character reasons in the scene.
For behavior, the Character Info guide asks for reactions and traits. The Scenario guide describes a permanent prompt affecting each dialogue round. Those are different authoring layers.
A release check with three separate failures
Take an original adult harbor pilot character. The public introduction spoils the ending of a rescue; the opening assumes the player is a trainee; and an otherwise ordinary portrait has the wrong content classification.
| Failure | Relevant documented control |
|---|---|
| The Rochat card gives away the ending | Edit Public Info for the audience |
| The Rochat character repeatedly assumes the wrong relationship | Review Character Info and Scenario |
| A LustChat image is marked adult despite your classification | Request image review through support |
LustChat’s FAQ says creators choose SFW or NSFW, that adult characters appear only when the viewer enables adult content, and that the team manually reviews character images. A classification dispute has a documented second-review route. It is not a prompt-writing problem.
The same FAQ says a public profile exposes profile/characters to others, while conversations remain private to their user. That setting answers who can discover the creation; it does not promise a different character response.
Edit one layer, then check that layer
On Rochat, remove the spoiler from Public Info and separately make the player relationship explicit in the actual character/scenario instructions. Inspect the card and start an ordinary conversation as two different checks. A corrected card alone is not evidence that the behavior changed.
On LustChat, inspect classification, adult-content visibility and profile visibility before assuming the character disappeared or the image was rejected. For a ban appeal, its FAQ asks for the character name and why the decision appears mistaken.
This is more useful than a general “more controls” ranking. Rochat’s public manual maps audience copy and model instructions separately; LustChat’s FAQ maps visibility and review decisions. Neither source establishes that the other product lacks all equivalent controls. Use the documented route that matches the actual failure.